|
On a small-scale map, such as a page-size map of Switzerland, places of religious worship occur at points, but on a large
scale map, such as a map of a local neighbourhood, individual buildings would likely be apparent, and thus the focus might
be on the area covered by the place of worship.
Similarly, a river could be considered a linear phenomena on a small-scale map, but on a large-scale map, the emphasis could
be on the area covered by the river. So, the map scale must be adapted to:
Large scale maps are on the whole not economic, not easy to handle, and sometimes misleading. And, small scales make on the
whole the map difficult to read, complicate, and sometimes are meaningless. Which scale is selected for a given map design
problem will finally depend on the map purpose and physical size. The amount of geographical detail necessary to satisfy the
purpose of the map will also act as a constraint in scale selection.
Generally, the scale used will be a compromise between these two controlling factors. When you represent the scale graphically
on the map, the measurement dimensions and the line thickness should be adapted to the map graphics.
The following example shows the interaction between the map component and the scale selection. Move the cursor with the mouse
to change the map scale.