These indices of texture are based on the dispersion of the properties in the neighborhood, they are thus dependent on the level of measurement of information. The following indices will be retained:
|
|
In order to illustrate the potential and the complementarity, but also the redundancy of contextual indices presented in this Unit, let us apply to the description of the spatial arrangement of land cover types in an urban area. Figure 3.6 presents the spatial distribution of 5 categories of land cover (Forest/bush, Meadow, Building, Road, Pavement) in an urban area made up of 4 distinct zones: individual housing, collective habitat, industrial park and green area. The size of the cells is of approximately 15m on side. These thematic properties being categories, they correspond to a nominal level of measurement.
Urban area made up of 5 different zones |
Figure 3.6
|
The description of the spatial arrangement of thematic properties of these units of observation (cells) can begin with the identification of the most represented land cover category in the neighborhood. We will thus choose to retain the modal value in the moving window. In order to experiment the effect of the neighborhood size on this index of majority (central tendency), we will choose a window size of 3x3 as well as 5x5.
Modal property of the neighborhood in windows of size 3x3 and 5x5 |
Figure 3.7
|
One can observe on figure 3.7 the prevalence of the meadow category for the 2 zones of habitat, of the forest/bush type for the green area and of the pavement category for the industrial park. When a window of larger size (5x5) is applied, then the spatial smoothing is more marked, thus reducing the presence of vaster regions (objects) such as the buildings of big size in the industrial park and in the collective habitat.
Indices of texture for windows of size 3x3 and 5x5 |
Figure 3.8
|